The Police Act 1996 Section 44 (2 and 3) states that the Home Secretary can require chief constables of forces in England and Wales to provide statistical data. He or she can also specify the form in which this data is given.
The Home Secretary uses these powers to require chief constables to give regular data on the number of crimes they record. This data must be recorded in accordance with the Home Office Crime Recording Rules (formerly referred to as the Home Office Counting Rules or HOCR). These rules aim to bring more consistency to the process of creating and maintaining crime records at force level.
The Crime Recording Rules also promote a victim-oriented approach to crime recording. This means that a belief by the victim that a crime has occurred is, in most cases, enough to justify its recording as a crime.
The crime recording process used by the police can be divided into six stages, which are set out below.
1. Incident reporting and recording
Incidents reported to the police relate to issues including public safety and welfare, crime, anti-social behaviour and transport. There are many ways that incidents can be reported to the police:
- victims, witnesses or other third parties can tell a police officer, police community support officer or member of staff either on the street or at the front counter of a police station;
- victims, witnesses or other third parties can telephone incidents to police control rooms;
- victims, witnesses or other third parties may report an incident online;
- the police might discover the crime themselves; or
- other agencies such as social services may refer them. It is also possible that other agencies will refer an incident that is clearly a crime.
The Crime Recording Rules require that “all reports of incidents, whether from victims, witnesses or third parties and whether crime related or not, will result in the registration of an incident report by the police”. They go on to specify that these must be recorded on an auditable system, which in practice means:
- an incident log (sometimes referred to as a command and control log); and/or,
- a record on the force crime system.
When recording an incident, staff allocate an “opening code” to the incident log. Opening codes indicate the nature of the incident, for example whether it relates to a road traffic accident or a burglary. Opening codes are important because they allow supervisors to see immediately what type of incidents are currently open and prioritise resources accordingly.
2. Deciding if a crime should be recorded
The Crime Recording Rules require:
“An incident will be recorded as a crime (notifiable offence)
- For offences against an identified victim if, on the balance of probability:
- The circumstances as reported amount to a crime defined by law (the police will determine this, based on their knowledge of the law and counting rules), and
- There is no credible evidence to the contrary.
- For offences against the state the points to prove to evidence the offence must clearly be made out, before a crime is recorded.”
Because the rules place an obligation on the police to accept what the victim says unless there is “credible evidence to the contrary”, the following reasons are not enough to justify not recording a crime:
- the victim declines to give personal details;
- the victim doesn’t want to take the matter further; or
- the allegation can’t be proven.
In relation to the balance of probability test, the National Crime Recording Standard (which is reproduced within annex A of the Crime Recording Rules) notes that:
“In most cases, a belief by the victim (or person reasonably assumed to be acting on behalf of the victim) that a crime has occurred is sufficient to justify its recording as a crime, although this will not be the case in all circumstances. Effectively, a more victim orientated approach is advocated.”
“An allegation should be considered as made, at the first point of contact, i.e. the stage at which the victim or a person reasonably assumed to be acting on behalf of the victim first makes contact with the police, be that by phone, etc. or in person. If an alleged or possible victim cannot be contacted or later refuses to provide further detail, the Crime Recording Decision Making Process (CRDMP) should be based on all available first contact information.”
Forces’ processes for deciding if a crime should be recorded
Forces operate different processes for deciding if a crime should be recorded and this has implications for the scope of their incident logs. For example, in cases where a member of the public reports an incident by telephone:
- Some forces initially record all calls as an incident and deploy an officer to the scene. The officer then decides if there has been a crime and, if there has, records the crime on the force crime system. In these forces all calls about crime will appear in the incident log.
- If it is obvious that there has been a crime, the Crime Recording Rules allow forces to record the crime without first recording an incident. Some forces follow this process and in those that do, not all calls about crime will appear in the incident log.
3. Closing incident records
Once a decision has been taken to record a crime, the incident record will often be closed. Any further information should be recorded in the force crime system. This avoids unnecessary duplication and makes sure all the information is kept only in one place.
Incident records are closed by adding a closing code. Closing codes give a brief description of the incident to summarise what finally happened. A set list of incident closing descriptions (the National Incident Category List – NICL) is in use by all forces. For example, an incident closed with an NICL code of Crime-Robbery indicates that a decision was taken to record a crime of robbery. Other examples of closing codes include ASB-Nuisance and Abandoned Call.
Sometimes the closing code will differ markedly from the opening code. For example, a report that someone has collapsed in the street may be given an opening code of “Public Safety and Welfare (PSW)”. But, if subsequent enquiries determined that the person has fallen because he or she has been assaulted, then the closing code would be “Crime–Violent”. In this example a crime record would be opened when the incident record was closed.
Closing codes are important as they allow supervisors to check that all necessary actions have been carried out. They also mean forces can count and understand the types of incidents being reported to the police.
4. Recording a crime
Once the police have decided to record a crime, they then need to determine how many crimes to record and what offences have been committed. Consider, for example, a burglary where the car keys are taken from a house and the car has been stolen:
- This may involve two offences: a burglary; and theft of a motor vehicle.
- If there is only one victim and only one offender for all these offences then only one crime would be recorded, although the offender may be charged and convicted of all the offences.
- If there are two or more victims in the same incident, a crime should be recorded for each victim.
The Crime Recording Rules require police to record crime at the earliest opportunity, and at the most within 24 hours of the time the reporting officer decides that a crime should be recorded.
5. Closing crime records
Crime records stay open while police investigate the crime, collect evidence and identify a suspect. Crime records should be closed only when:
- The crime has been detected (solved). The Crime Recording Rules set out the criteria for determining if a crime has been detected. These include, for example, when a person being cautioned, charged, or summonsed to appear at court about the crime.
- Alternatively, it may become apparent that a crime never actually happened. For example, an item initially recorded as stolen was then found to have been mislaid. In these circumstances the police may show in the crime record that there was crime was ‘cancelled’. There are six criteria for a ‘cancelled’ set out in the Crime Recording Rules, with the principle one being if “additional verifiable information is available which determines that no notifiable crime has been committed”. If, for example, following an investigation of a reported rape the police are ‘unclear’ as to whether an offence has taken place, then the crime record should stay open, because being ‘unclear’ does not constitute additional verifiable information which determines that the offence did not take place.
6. Checking that crime records are correct
Each force has a crime registrar who is responsible for overseeing compliance with the crime recording process. He or she is the final arbiter for the force when deciding whether or not to record a crime or make a decision cancel a crime. The registrar’s responsibilities include training staff in the crime recording process and conducting audits to check compliance with the rules. All forces also designate a senior officer (of chief officer rank, usually the deputy chief constable) as being responsible for overseeing the force’s approach to crime recording. The Crime Recording Rules state that the force crime registrar must be outside operational line command and answerable to the chief officer with overall responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of crime recording processes.